Budaya Kuliner Jalanan sebagai Interioritas Urban Sementara: Kehidupan Publik dan Adaptasi Spasial di Karawang
Kata Kunci:
Adaptasi Spasial, Urban Furnitur, Interioritas Fana, Ruang PublikAbstrak
Kondisi perkotaan pasca-pandemi telah mendefinisikan ulang pentingnya ruang publik sebagai medium pemulihan kolektif, interaksi sosial, dan aktivitas ekonomi informal. Di berbagai kota Asia Tenggara, kebangkitan kultur kuliner jalanan mencerminkan tidak hanya revitalisasi ekonomi, tetapi juga bentuk adaptasi spasial terhadap keterbatasan ruang urban. Namun, meskipun sejumlah studi telah membahas peran sosial-ekonomi pedagang kaki lima, dimensi spasial, sensorik, dan atmosferik yang membentuk lingkungan informal ini masih jarang dieksplorasi secara mendalam. Penelitian ini mengkaji fenomena interioritas urban fana melalui studi kasus koridor kuliner jalanan di Karawang, Indonesia sebuah kawasan peri-urban yang tengah mengalami transformasi pesat akibat ekspansi industri dan fragmentasi sosial. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif studi kasus yang didukung observasi partisipatif, pemetaan sensorik, dan wawancara mendalam, penelitian ini menelusuri bagaimana konfigurasi material temporer, negosiasi kolektif, dan pengalaman afektif bersama membentuk kondisi spasial menyerupai interior di ruang publik terbuka. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ruang kuliner jalanan berfungsi sebagai infrastruktur adaptif yang memperkuat kohesi sosial dan ketahanan spasial melalui kolaborasi akar rumput serta fleksibilitas temporal. Studi ini berkontribusi terhadap wacana arsitektur dan perkotaan dengan menempatkan temporer dan informalitas sebagai bentuk kecerdasan desain, bukan ketidakteraturan urban. Konsep interioritas urban adaptif yang ditawarkan memperluas pemahaman teoretis tentang praktik spasial keseharian dan memberikan wawasan praktis bagi perancangan ruang publik yang inklusif serta kontekstual di wilayah yang mengalami urbanisasi cepat
Referensi
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Chase, J., Crawford, M., & Kaliski, J. (Eds.). (1999). Everyday Urbanism. New York: Monacelli Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Denzin, N. K. (2017). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. New York: Routledge.
Hernandez-Garcia, J. (2020). Informality as a Spatial Practice: Reclaiming Urban Space in Latin American Cities. Urban Studies Journal, 57(6), 1153–1170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019847440
Kawamura, M. (2019). Sensory Urbanism: Experiencing the City through the Senses. Journal of Urban Design, 24(3), 387–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2018.1562529
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Marinic, J. (2020). Interior Provocations: History, Theory, and Practice of Autonomous Interiors. New York: Routledge.
Pratiwi, L. (2023). Street Food as Urban Commons: Informal Food Practices in Southeast Asian Cities. Urban Culture and Society, 46, 101071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urbanc.2023.101071
Putra, D. R., Santoso, A., & Widodo, H. (2023). Industrial Transformation and Urban Fragmentation in Karawang, Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Regional and Urban Studies, 7(1), 33–49.
Santoso, A. (2023). From Agrarian Land to Industrial Corridor: Peri-Urban Transition in Karawang. Jurnal Tata Kota dan Daerah, 15(2), 101–117.
Siahaan, M. (2021). Ruang Publik Informal dan Ekonomi Rakyat Pasca Pandemi. Jurnal Sosiologi Kota, 12(1), 45–58.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Widodo, A. (2022). Socio-Spatial Inequalities in Peri-Urban Industrial Regions: The Case of Karawang. Urban Studies Forum Indonesia, 9(3), 201–215.
World Bank. (2022). Public Spaces for Post-Pandemic Recovery: Rethinking Urban Design for Social Resilience. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank Group.
Yu, C. (2021). Atmospheric Interiors: Between Public Intimacy and Urban Space. Journal of Interior Architecture Research, 9(2), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/20507828.2021.1914025
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Amin, A. (2008). Collective culture and urban public space. City, 12(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810801933495
Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Baudrillard, J. (2005). The System of Objects. London: Verso.
Borden, I., Rendell, J., Penner, B., & Vidler, A. (2000). Gender Space Architecture: An Interdisciplinary Introduction. London: Routledge.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Chase, J., Crawford, M., & Kaliski, J. (Eds.). (1999). Everyday Urbanism. New York: Monacelli Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
De Certeau, M. (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Denzin, N. K. (2017). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. New York: Routledge.
Franck, K. A., & Stevens, Q. (2007). Loose Space: Possibility and Diversity in Urban Life. New York: Routledge.
Gehl, J. (2011). Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Hernandez-Garcia, J. (2020). Informality as a Spatial Practice: Reclaiming Urban Space in Latin American Cities. Urban Studies Journal, 57(6), 1153–1170.
Hou, J. (Ed.). (2010). Insurgent Public Space: Guerrilla Urbanism and the Remaking of Contemporary Cities. New York: Routledge.
Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.
Kawamura, M. (2019). Sensory Urbanism: Experiencing the City through the Senses. Journal of Urban Design, 24(3), 387–403.
Koolhaas, R. (2001). Junkspace. October, 100, 175–190.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Marinic, J. (2020). Interior Provocations: History, Theory, and Practice of Autonomous Interiors. New York: Routledge.
Pratiwi, L. (2023). Street Food as Urban Commons: Informal Food Practices in Southeast Asian Cities. Urban Culture and Society, 46, 101071.
Putra, D. R., Santoso, A., & Widodo, H. (2023). Industrial Transformation and Urban Fragmentation in Karawang, Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Regional and Urban Studies, 7(1), 33–49.
Rendell, J. (2006). Art and Architecture: A Place Between. London: I.B. Tauris.
Santoso, A. (2023). From Agrarian Land to Industrial Corridor: Peri-Urban Transition in Karawang. Jurnal Tata Kota dan Daerah, 15(2), 101–117.
Sennett, R. (2018). Building and Dwelling: Ethics for the City. London: Allen Lane.
Siahaan, M. (2021). Ruang Publik Informal dan Ekonomi Rakyat Pasca Pandemi. Jurnal Sosiologi Kota, 12(1), 45–58.
Till, J. (2009). Architecture Depends. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tonkiss, F. (2013). Cities by Design: The Social Life of Urban Form. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Widodo, A. (2022). Socio-Spatial Inequalities in Peri-Urban Industrial Regions: The Case of Karawang. Urban Studies Forum Indonesia, 9(3), 201–215.
World Bank. (2022). Public Spaces for Post-Pandemic Recovery: Rethinking Urban Design for Social Resilience. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank Group.
Yu, C. (2021). Atmospheric Interiors: Between Public Intimacy and Urban Space. Journal of Interior Architecture Research, 9(2), 77–93.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Muhamad Miftahul Karim
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
